We don’t need Phyllis Schlafly in the White House

If you remember Phyllis Schlafly, the woman who fought the Equal Rights Amendment back in the 1970s — or even if you have just read about her — you’ll be interested in Gloria Steinem’s Sept. 4 article.

In the piece, which originally ran in the LA Times, she calls Sarah Palin, the new Republican vice-presidential nominee, “Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.”

Steinem also makes these points about where Palin stands on the issues:

  • “She believes creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves global warming
  • she opposes gun control but supports government control of women’s wombs
  • she opposes stem cell research but approves “abstinenceonly” programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions;
  • she tried to use taxpayers’ millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn’t spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest highschool graduation rate in the nation;
  • she runs with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but she supports $500 million in subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska;
  • she supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the lesser evil of offshore drilling.”

 Read the whole story here. Then read about convention protests against Palin at Feministing.com.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: